...raising an only child is not what I had imagined I would be doing. I had rather imagined myself as a Mother Earth figure raising a pack brood of ruffians and hellions and loving every moment. Well, if not enough to have a football team of my own, a couple of kids at least. Well, the best laid plans of mice and men...and all that goes with the territory have ensured that it seems, for the moment at least, that the brat is destined to be an only child.
And over the past week I have been thrown into the thick of discussions regarding only children and parents divided over the issue, dithering about whether to go ahead for various reasons, all very valid, I grant. And I wonder, yet again, whether I am doing the right thing by not having another child. Granted I am back to blimp land again and just a couple of kilos from my weight at full term when I was carrying the brat, so I might as well go the whole hog and pile it on with a valid excuse at that. But as this article says, recent research does show that only children are indistinguishable from children with siblings. And sometimes the grass is greener on the other side. Those with siblings they arent close to might prefer to swap my only child status with me anyday. And when I read of property wars between siblings, it makes me wonder how money takes precedence over wealth with nary a sigh. And then I read about siblings who rally around each other in times of crisis and sigh again. Having said that, the husband has four siblings. And they are close. But not exceptionally close. Each one lives their own lives, but they do rally around during crisis. Their bond is different. It is invisible but strong. Not fuelled by constant conversations or discussions or meetings, given that they are scattered around the country, but very present. My mother has nine siblings. And they are like rocks to each other. If one is ill, the rest come together like a single fist to help out. They might bitch each other at other times, but they're together. They're older. Empty nesters. They need each other. The mother in law has five siblings. None of whom are in any great contact with her. The occasional phone call a couple of times a year perhaps. I guess sibling relations vary from family to family.
What is my take on the entire debate, having reconciled myself to probably not having a second child? I would have preferred to give my child a sibling, but since thats not going to happen until both parents come around, I am happy for him to be an only child. I ensure that he has a social life so hectic, he could pay me a salary for being his social secretary. Playdates, parties, picnics, movies with friends, form the norm of the week for him. What also helps for me, I guess, is that we live in a joint family where there are already plenty of people in the house to keep him occupied, excluding the help, who happily pitch in for the occasional game of cricket or even doing the number and alphabet revision with the brat who happily learns his capitals and lower case from the maid who dredges her memory for the little she had learnt during her few years in school. So you have the rather quaint sight of the brat learning his ABCs from the maid, and me sitting in attendance helping the maid throw together alphabets and read words off the newspaper to me.
I'm ambivalent. I know he will turn out fine. I did. And my mother did a great job on me. I am sure I will do the best I can with him. And he, like his mother, is a social child. Until adolescence I guess, when he transforms inevitably into a black clad snarling antisocial stranger, who emerges only to ask for his pocketmoney.
Some of his friends have siblings, some are only children like he is. He seems unfazed yet with the seeming denial of a sibling though occasionally he does ask his father to put the baby seed in Mamma's stomach and make Mamma drink lotsa water to make the baby grow fast fast so that doctor can cut the stomach and take baby out. (Dont ask. Too much education on reproduction already happened thanks to friend's mamma's being pregnant and having new babies over the past couple of years). He also has many cousins he meets up with every vacation and assumes it is his birthright to have them around every vacation to keep him entertained.
On the whole, he's not skulking in corners yets whining about solitude and neglect and cruelty. And I do know I'm not either. I have my friends too, some of whom are closer than sisters could ever be, I think. I dont know. I've never had a sister. Or a brother. In the modern urban milieu, friends become surrogate family. And its true what they say, friends are family you get to choose.
I pray my little son chooses his friends well. And makes friends of the heart and not of the road. And doesnt grow up to resent me and his father for not providing him a sibling. But then, to think of it, I dont resent my mother for the same, do I?
What's your take on this debate?

14 opinions:
Kiran, I have a wonderful friend who is a paediatrician. She herself has only one child, as all her subsequent pregnancies did not carry till term. After trying a few times, and realising the trauma her family underwent each time she miscarried, she stopped trying. She tells me that she can accept what happened as God's will, though she still cannot understand it.
Her daughter has three kids now, and happily has her hands full.
All this is to say is that given the issues during your first pregnancy, perhaps your husband doesn't want you and the family to undergo all that trauma again.
Another cousin divorced when her daughter was about 6 or so. She has PCOS, and after her second marriage miscarried a couple of times, when her husband put his foot down. He has legally adopted her daughter and is perfectly happy without having any issue of his own. He didn't think it worth risking what they have for a baby who might never be.
Let the Powers-that-be guide you to what is best for you and your family. One question- are you and hubby open to adoption? It might fulfill your craving for a baby without all the other issues.
i guess an only child does not know what they are missing and come to terms with it. but glad krish has so many cousins to giv him company. god willing they will turn out to be as close as real siblings. on my part, none of my dad's siblings bother to keep in touch with him while my mom's siblings r close knitted- they bitch thyeir heart out against each other yet they r in touch always. i hardly know my paternal cousins. it varies from family to family. btw, considered adoption? it's tough but do u want to try that?
K
I have already said everything that there is to be said on this topic. And yet I have this one point to add to it. The decision is entirely upto the parents. And having made it, all one can do is try and make the life as eventful and full for the child as possible, just as you are doing. I am an only child. I never regretted it. If my son never has a sibling, I hope he won't either.
Lady K - I'm an only child, but lived in a joint family - so never missed not having a sibling, given that I had dad's sister's daughter always with us and we grew up almost like sisters. But cousins are different from real siblings. There is no common blood or parents and I hate to think I have none to talk to when I'm upset, other than prents. So mommy is my best friend and mother. But I dont want my little girl to be alone. I defintely want her to have a sibling - who will be her own blood - with whom she'll grow up and enjoy. I think as you've rightly mentioned, relationships are different in different families, but others ahve already suggested the alternate route. I guess its all in our mind. IT plasy th monkey games from time to time.
when the going gets tough just tell yourself that kids (and krish) do change their mind but the second child when it comes "is for life"...worst case scenario, he is excited about the new sibling for a fortnight and then he says "please take it back now"..
My sister and me drove my poor mother nuts when we were kids about having a baby brother or sister (this when my father had passed away...my god, it could have been like knives in her heart) and our reason was that we wanted to have the liberty of a particular sibling as our fav and to ignore another...at the moment we were stuck just playing or ignoringe each other...pretty altrusitic huh!!
But this too will pass...in the meantime we could pray to the good Lord for another Immaculate Conception!! it would be nice to have bub number 2 with min. input by reluctant husband.
:)
like you said the bonds vary with every family! brother and me are very close! no we dont discuss secret (he is good 7 years younger), but i just CANNOT imagine my life without him! once i got over hating him for being a l'il insect, life was just a roller coaster of fun!
on the other hand, M and his bro just dont qualify as close! we live in the same city and we meet like once in 2months when the kids are just one year apart! i mean Cubby has his first cousin in town and he never gets to see him!
at the end of the day i feel that sibling is always better! but if you dont, its defi not an earth shattering happening in your life!
and as Dipali says, why not adopt, if really keen?!
rakhi for raksha bandhan!! :D
cheers!
abha
I know it must have been a very tough decision to have just one child. But yes, single children are not at any disadvantage compared to children with siblings. Of course, it falls on the parents to teach them to share and be content not being the center of universe etc. (all not very hard things to teach anyway) which otherwise they's learn if they had a sibling. S was an only child for 8.5 years and still wasn't spoiled (one of the arguments given against having single children)
OK - I am rambling :P Hugs dearo. When I was having problems conceiving, my biggest fear was that S might grow up thinking we deprived her of a sibling. Your experience would have come in as a great reassurance.
One, or 5 - number doesn't matter.
Kiran,
That's a wonderfully written piece, but I think you're stressing the bit about "how will the child I have react to a sibling or lack thereof".
Perhaps a better approach would be to figure out what *your* opinion on the issue is. That's perhaps a tad bit more important that whether its beter for your existing kid or not :-)
i'm not saying you haven't thought about it already, just saying that it doesn't seem to be a big part of this post. Also, on a related note, I can't seem to understand how parents ask their older children if they *want* another sibling and then make their decision accordingly.
I'm sorry if I've come across as a little harsh - that's not my intention at all, I'm struggling with the same debate right now and can totally relate !
Whatever you decide, good luck.
Priya.
Kiran: I have no take on this re: children. But a couple of things:
1. I do think, reading your blog, that your son has grown up very well inspite of everything precisely because of the tremendous attention you were able to give him as an only child. You might want to keep that in mind when thinking about baby no 2 (whether adopted or biological). You will definitely not be able to give him this attention with another child to deal with.
2. I have plenty of friends who have one child (its somewhat of a norm now with my friends) and their kids seem as happy and well adjusted as those with siblings.
3. In the vast scheme of things children will ALWAYS blame their parents for something but I'm not sure that not giving them a sibling ranks that high. Think about other scenarios of blame that are far more likely to happen "My parents always favored my sibling over me, woe is me, etc etc". That's because psychology tells us that we are more likely to focus on commissions than omissions.
n!
You said it yourself, K - each family has a different dynamic. And you'll work out one that suits you all...
hmm.. well i had the second one as you know, because i always wanted two kids. i dont know what i'd have done if the OA was against it. but i do know that yes, family dynamics are different everywhere. but let me quote you back babe - from maybe two days ago :p - we plan, hoping for the best - not the worst.
that said. if its health isses... and dipali's idea is suitable to you all.. give it some thought.
krish loves company. i can bet you my last rupee what while sibling rivalry will be there (its the earliest form of competition) - he will be thrilled to bits.
and like me, you can put your feet up and let him teach the younger one the alphabet, nursery rhymes and generally entertain each other.
see ;) always one to find a way to lump my duties on someone else's head.
Dont know if you read my take on this
http://abouttimenow.blogspot.com/2007/05/minority-report.html
you know where I stand. I am in your corner. But I know our kids will grow up fine.
You already answered your own question, didn't you? Have friends who were single kids - none of them resent it. Krish won't either.
Post a Comment